Mitigating Learning Loss and Accelerating Learning Recovery through New Learning Strategies in TEFL
Abstract
In the post-pandemic era, many Indonesian students suffer learning loss. After the government allows the schools to have offline learning, teachers and lecturers should do acceleration for learning recovery. This study is aimed to describe strategies used by English lecturers to recover learning loss. This study is a descriptive qualitative study that focuses on English lectures at higher education levels. The data was collected through semi-structured interviews with some English lecturers who teach in the English education department and other departments at several universities in Indonesia. The technique of data analysis includes data reduction, data display, conclusion drawing, and data validation through triangulation technique from data resources. The result shows that there are four strategies that used by the lecturers to mitigate learning loss and accelerate learning recovery for EFL learners, they are teaching using more interesting and various teaching strategies, such as Drill and Practise method to improve vocabulary mastery, promoting autonomous and cooperative learning, designing joyful learning activities, and implementing project-based learning. Therefore, lecturers perceive that to accelerate learning recovery, lecturers should provide more time, energy, and strategies to catch up with the learning loss suffered by students.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Angrist, N., Andreasde Barrosa, Radhika, B., Shiraz, C., Chris, C., Kaffen, bergerd, & Benjamin, P. et. al. (2021). Building Back Better to Avert a Learning Catastrophe: Estimating Learning Loss from COVID-19 School Shutdowns in Africa and Facilitating Short-term and Long-term Learning Recovery. Educational Development, 84.
BSNP. (2010). Standar Isi Pendidikan Tinggi.
Butcher et.al. (2021). The Struggle against COVID-19 in Indonesian Education: Responses, Requirements, and Policy needs for Learning Recovery. World Bank.
Engzell, Per, Frey A., D Verhagen, M. (2021). Learning Loss due to School Closures during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 17.
Hevia, Felipe J, Calderon, D. (2022). Estimation of the Fundemantal Learning Loss and Learning Poverty Related to Covid-19 Pndemic in Mexico. International Journal of Educational Development, 88.
Lemon, L. L., & Hayes, J. (2020). Enhancing trustworthiness of qualitative findings: Using leximancer for qualitative data analysis triangulation. Qualitative Report, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4222
Miles, M. B. &, & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook: Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publication.
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. In Language Teaching Research (Vol. 19, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
Nowak, L. (2015). Traditional Versus Distance Learning Course Structures: Differences In Student Learning And Satisfaction. Proceedings of the 2002 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference.
Page, E., Leonard-Kane, R., Kashefpakdel, E., Riggal, A., & Guerriero, S. (2021). Learning Loss, Learning Gains and Wellbeing: A Rapid Evidence Assessment. Education Development Trust.
Rokhyati, U. (2013). TEACHING ENGLISH AT HIGHER EDUCATION IN INDONESIA: SEARCHING FOR USEFULNESS. SELT 2013 Proceeding.
UNICEF. (2019). A World Ready to Learn: Prioritizing Quality Early Childhood Education.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v5i5.5511
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 0 timesPDF - 0 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Zumrotul Fauziah, Sri Minarti

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



1.png)