The Effect Of Indirect Coded Versus Indirect Non-Coded Corrective Feedback On Improving Students’ Grammatical Accuracy Of EFL Writing Class

Maksimilianus Doi, Fransiskus Maria Separ, Febe F. Irawati Wanggai

Abstract


The aimed at investigating the effectiveness of indirect coded CF and indirect non-coded CF on improving grammatical accuracy at the fourth semester students of English Literature Study Program Flores University in 2013/2014. This research was quasi-experiment with pre-test-post-test non-equivalent design. As the sample, 54 students in three intact classes with 18 students of each class were randomly assigned to three groups; indirect coded CF, indirect non-coded CF, and control groups. Free writing was the major source of data. The scoring scheme adopted based on the five categories; content, organization, vocabulary, language use, and mechanics. The instrument reliability was assessed by the inter-rater technique. ANCOVA was to analyze data continued by post-hoc Scheffe. The upshots denote that (1) indirect-coded CF and indirect non-coded CF have a significant difference of effectiveness on grammatical accuracy in the second draft with self editing strategy: (2) indirect coded CF is more effective than indirect non-coded CF, and that of control group in the second draft with self-editing strategy; (3) indirect coded CF and indirect non-coded CF have a significant different in a new draft; (4) indirect coded CF is more effective than indirect non-coded CF, and that of control group in a new draft


Keywords


effect, indirect coded corrective feedback, indirect non-coded corrective feedback, grammatical accuracy, self-editing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akkuzu, N. (2014). The role of different types of feedback in the reciprocal interaction of teaching performance and self-efficacy belief. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 37–66.

Amara, N. (2015). Errors Correction in Foreign Language Teaching. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 5(3), 58–68.

ARSLAN, R. Ş. (2014). Integrating feedback into prospective english language teachers’ writing process via blogs and portfolios. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 131–150.

Ayuba, H., & Widodo, P. (2015). Pengembangan Tes gramatika berbasis Web untuk Mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo. LingTera, 2(3), 111–121.

Bankier, J. (2012). Post-Text and In-Text Corrective Feedback. Language Education, 3(1), 85–95.

Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2012). Writtem Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.14706/jeh2019213

Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191–205.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research Design; Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. (Fourth Edi). Lonson: Sage Publications, Inc.

Eslami, E. (2014). The Effects of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback Techniques on EFL Students ’ Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 445–452.

Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. University of Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

Foin, A. T., & Lange, E. J. (2007). Generation 1.5 Writers’ Success in Correcting Errors Marked on an Out-of-Class Paper. The CATESOL, 19(1), 146–163.

Hardi, V. A. (2020). The Rules of Feedback in Writing Class. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(3), 244–252.

Hartshorn, K. J., & Evans, N. W. (2012). The Differential Effects of Comprehensive Corrective Feedback on L2 Writing Accuracy. IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 9(4), 319–334.

Hasbemifardnia, A., Namaziandost, E., & Sepehri, M. (2019). The effectiveness of giving grade , corrective feedback , and corrective feedback-plus-giving grade on grammatical accuracy. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 8(1), 15–27.

Jamalinesari, A., Rahimi, F., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A. (2015). The Effects of Teacher-Written Direct vs. Indirect Feedback on Students’ Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 116–123.

Kassim, A., & Ng, L. L. (2014). Investigating the Efficacy of Focused and Unfocused Corrective Feedback on the Accurate Use of Prepositions in Written Work. 7(2), 119–130.

Khanlarzadeh, M., & Nemati, M. (2016). Language Teaching Research The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students : An improvement over previous unfocused designs. Language Teaching Research, 4(2), 55–68.

Larasati, M. M. B. (2021). Kemampuan Menulis Naskah Drama Pentas dengan Menggunakan Media Cerita Rakyat Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2), 376–384.

Lee, Y.-J. (2020). The long-term effect of automated writing evaluation feedback on writing development. English Teaching, 75(1), 67–92.

Norouzian, R. (2012). Written Error Feedback from Perception to Practice : A Feedback on Feedback. 3(1), 11–22.

Okasha, M. A., & Hamdi, S. A. (2014). Using strategic writing techniques for promoting EFL writing skills and attitudes. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(3), 674–681.

Pawlak, M. (2014). Second Language Learning and Teaching : Error Correction in the Foreign Language Classroom. Heiderlberg: Springer.

Rizkiani, S., Bhuana, G. P., & Rizgiya, R. S. (2019). Coded vs Uncoded corrective Feedback on Teaching Writing Descriptive Tect. ELTIN, 8(1), 55–66.

Saadi, Z. K., & Saadat, M. (2015). Iranian EFL Learners ’ Grammatical Knowledge : Effect of Direct and Metalinguistic Corrective Feedback. 8(8), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n8p112

Salimi, A. (2015). The Effect of Coded and Uncoded Written Corrective Feedback on the Accuracy of Learners Writing in Pre-intermediate Level. 4(3). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.3p.116

Savage, K. L., Bitterlin, G., & Price, D. (2010). Grammar matters: Teaching Grammar in Adult ESL Programs. In Cambridge University Press. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Sawalmeh, M. H. M. (2013). Error Analysis of Written English Essays : The case of Students of the Preparatory Year Program in Saudi Arabia. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14(40), 1552–1557.

Seiffedin, A. H. (2017). The Impact of Direct-indirect Corrective E- feedback on EFL Student s ’ Writing Accuracy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(3), 166–175.

Seker, M., & Dincer, A. (2014). An insight to students’ perceptions on teacher feedback in second language writing classes. English Language Teaching, 7(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n2p73

Sermsook, K., Liamnimitr, J., & Pochakorn, R. (2017). The Impact of Teacher Corrective Feedback on EFL Student Writers ’ Grammatical Improvement. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 43–49.

Wang, T., & Jiang, L. (2015). Studies on Written Corrective Feedback : Theoretical Perspectives , Empirical Evidence , and Future Directions. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n1p110




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i2.365

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 648 times
PDF - 358 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Maksimilianus Doi, Fransiskus Maria Separ, Febe F. Irawati Wanggai

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.