Analisis Kualitas Disertasi Berdasarkan Hasil Review Komisi Sekolah Pascasarjana

Komarudin Komarudin, Andi Suhandi, Juntika Nurihsan, Disman Disman, Geraldi Novian

Abstract


Kualitas penulisan dan penyusunan disertasi menjadi gambaran kuat terhadap kemampuan akademik mahasiswa dalam merancang, melaksanakan, dan melaporkan hasil penelitiannya. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis kualitas disertasi berdasarkan hasil review Komisi Pascasarjana UPI. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan metode survey. Subjek adalah seluruh mahasiswa program doktor (S3) Sekolah Pascasarjana UPI yang mengusulkan review disertasi. Subjek dalam penelitian ini diambil menggunakan teknik convenience sampling sehingga seluruh mahasiswa yang mengusulkan review disertasi saja yang akan dipilih menjadi subjek. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu instrumen Format Review Disertasi yang terdiri dari enam aspek dalam disertasi yang akan dinilai oleh para reviewer. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis statistik kuantitatif dengan menggunakan t test dengan bantuan program SPSS versi 24 for windows. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa bahwa terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan hasil reviu terhadap kualitas disertasi. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa reviu yang dilakukan oleh para reviewer memberikan dampak yang signifikan terhadap kualitas disertasi.


Keywords


analisis; disertasi; kualitas; review; sekolah pascasarjana

Full Text:

PDF

References


Basturkmen, H., East, M., & Bitchener, J. (2014). Supervisors’ on-script feedback comments on drafts of dissertations: Socialising students into the academic discourse community. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(4), 432–445.

Blum, L. D. (2010). The “all-but-the-dissertation†student and the psychology of the doctoral dissertation. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 24(2), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/87568220903558554

Bourke, S., & Holbrook, A. P. (2013). Examining PhD and research masters theses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(4), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.638738

Bowen, G. A. (2010). From qualitative dissertation to quality articles: Seven lessons learned. Qualitative Report, 15(4), 864–879. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1185

Chikate, R. V., & Patil, S. K. (2008). Citation analysis of theses in library and information science submitted to university of Pune: A pilot study. Library Philosophy and Practice, DEC.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research Desain: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (3rd ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Disman, D., Ali, M., & Syaom Barliana, M. (2017). the Use of Quantitative Research Method and Statistical Data Analysis in Dissertation: an Evaluation Study. International Journal of Education, 10(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v10i1.5566

Dwihandini, L. A., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Suarnajaya, I. W. (2013). The Analysis of the Factors Affecting Undergraduate Students ’ Difficulties in Writing Thesis in the English Department of Mahasaraswati. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 2, 1–12. pasca.undiksha.ac.id/e-journal/index.php/jurnal_bahasa/article/view/903

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8th Ed.). Mc Graw Hill.

Jayaprakash, & Kannappanavar, B. U. (2015). Citation Analysis of Doctoral Dissertations in Commerce Submitted to Goa University, Goa: A Bibliometric Study. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 5(2), 160–177.

Karadaǧ, E. (2011). Instruments used in Doctoral Dissertations in Educational Sciences in Turkey: Quality of Research and Analytical errors. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 11(1), 330–334.

Kumar, H. A., & Dora, M. (2011). Citation analysis of doctoral dissertations at IIMA: A review of the local use of journals. Library Collections, Acquisition and Technical Services, 35(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2011.03.002

Kumar, S., Johnson, M., & Hardemon, T. (2013). Dissertations at a distance: Students’ perceptions of online mentoring in a doctoral program. International Journal of E- Learning & Distance Education, 27(1).

Kyvik, S., & Thune, T. (2015). Assessing the quality of PhD dissertations. A survey of external committee members. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 768–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.956283

Laosum, T., Kanjanawasee, S., & Pitayanon, T. (2016). Development of a dissertation quality value-added model for humanities and social sciences programs for private higher education institutions in Thailand. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 37(3), 138–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.010

Lehan, T., Hussey, H., & Mika, E. (2016). Reviewing the review: An assessment of dissertation reviewer feedback quality. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 13(1).

Mahajan, P., & Kumar, A. (2017). Citation analysis of doctoral theses references as a tool for collection management in history: A study of Panjab university, Chandigarh (India). Library Philosophy and Practice, 2017(1).

Ormanci, Ü. (2020). Thematic content analysis of doctoral theses in STEM education: Turkey context. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(1), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.17

Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang. (2010). Prosedur Tetap (Protap) Disertasi.

Saehu, A. (2013). An Analysis of English Thesis Writing: A Case Study of English Department of UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. English Review: Journal of English Education, 2(1), 1–8.

Santoso, S. (2017). Complete Guide to Mastering Statistics with SPSS 24. PT. Elex Media Komputindo.

Szekely, T., Kruger, O., & Krause, E. T. (2014). Errors in science: The role of reviewers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(7), 371–373.

Thomas, B., & Skinner, H. (2012). Dissertation to Journal Article: A Systematic Approach. Education Research International, 2012(i), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/862135

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia. (2019). Pedoman Penulisan Karya Ilmiah.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i4.3389

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 18 times
PDF - 8 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Komarudin Komarudin, Andi Suhandi, Juntika Nurihsan, Disman Disman, Geraldi Novian

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.