Faktor Dominan Penerapan Prinsip Inkuiri dalam Pembelajaran IPA SMP

Adrianus Nasar, Yasinta Embu Ika

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: 1) tingkat kekerapan guru menggunakan level inkuiri dalam pembelajaran IPA di sekolah; 2) level inkuiri yang dominan digunakan guru dalam pembelajaran di kelas. Populasi adalah guru IPA SMP di Pulau Flores dan Lembata dengan sampel diperoleh secara acak dengan jumlah 140 orang. Pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner yang disebarkan menggunakan google form. Instrumen penelitian menggunakan skala likert berjumlah 27 butir, yang terdiri atas 9 butir untuk masing-masing level inkuiri. Analisis deskriptif digunakan untuk tingkat kekerapan level inkuiri dan analisis faktor digunakan untuk menentukan inkuiri yang dominan digunakan guru dalam pembelajaran IPA di kelas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan 1) Tingkat kekerapan guru menggunakan prinsip inkuiri dalam pembelajaran IPA di kelas adalah selalu menerapkan untuk structured inquiry (4,23), biasa menerapkan untuk guided inquiry (4,10) dan biasa menerapak untuk open inquiry (3,83); 2) Structured inquiry merupakan faktor dominan bagi guru dalam menerapkan pembelajaran IPA di kelas dengan kontribusi sebesar 74,291%.


Keywords


structured inquiry, guided inquiry, open inquiry, analisis faktor

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alberta. (2004). Focus on inquiry: a teacher’s guide to implementing inquiry-based learning. In Alberta Learning Cataloguing in Publication Data. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40016096677/

Baker, D. R., Lewis, E. B., Purzer, S., Watts, N. B., Perkins, G., Uysal, S., Wong, S., Beard, R., & Lang, M. (2009). The Communication in Science Inquiry Project (CISIP): A project to enhance scientific literacy through the creation of science classroom discourse communities. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 259–274.

Çavaş, B., Holbrook, J., Kask, K., & Rannikmae, M. (2013). Development of an Instrument To Determine Science Teachers’ Implementation of Inquiry Based Science Education in Their Classrooms. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 2(2), 9–22. www.iojpe.org

Cheruiyot, B. J. (2018). Teacher Factors that Influence the Choice of Teaching Methods Used by Early Childhood Development Education Teachers in Keiyo South District. Africa International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (AIJMR), 2(1), 7–17. www.oircjournals.org

ÇORLU, M. A., & ÇORLU, M. S. (2012). Scientific Inquiry Based Professional Development Models in Teacher Education. Educational Sciences: Theory {&} Practice, 12(1), 514–521. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true%7B&%7Ddb=a9h%7B&%7DAN=84136140%7B&%7Dsite=ehost-live%7B&%7Dscope=site

Duran, M. (2014). A Study on 7 th Grade Students’ Inquiry and Communication Competencies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4511–4516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.976

Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student’s critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 2887–2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a

Erdoğan, V. (2019). Integrating 4C Skills of 21st Century into 4 Language Skills in EFL Classes. International Journal of Education and Research, 7(11), 113–124.

Facione, P. a. (2011). Critical Thinking : What It Is and Why It Counts. In Insight assessment (Issue ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1.). https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF

Gholam, A. (2019). Inquiry-Based Learning: Student Teachers’ Challenges and Perceptions. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 10(2), 112–133.

Kuech, R. (2004). Collaborative and {Interactional} {Processes} in an {Inquiry}-{Based}, {Informal} {Learning} {Environment}. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 39(1), 30–41.

Lopes, R. P., Mesquita, C., de la Cruz Del Río-Rama, M., & Ãlvarez-García, J. (2018). Collaborative learning experiences for the development of higher-order thinking. Espacios, 39(17).

NRC. (1996). National Science Education Standards National. In Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi (Vol. 26, Issue ï¼–ï¼’).

Ristina, H., Linuwih, S., & Nuswowati, M. (2019). Journal of Innovative Science Education SETS Learning Efficacy to Improve Students Science Literacy Skills. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 8(2), 183–189. file:///C:/Users/ERMAWATI-PC/Documents/GS FULL/GS 104.27905-Article Text-62036-2-10-20190818.pdf

Rodríguez, G., Pérez, N., Núñez, G., Baños, J. E., & Carrió, M. (2019). Developing creative and research skills through an open and interprofessional inquiry-based learning course. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1563-5

Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383–399.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i2.2488

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 444 times
PDF - 214 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Adrianus Nasar, Yasinta Embu Ika

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.